> Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can > now use the new struct_size() helper: I am okay with this patch in general. However, I think the name of the helper 'struct_size' is a bit unfortunate. I really wondered on the first read why it needs 3 arguments to find out a struct size. I only understood on the second read. I think 'trailing_array_struct_size' would be way more clearer what it does.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
