On 2019-01-04 19:06, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> Instead of leaving these open-coded and prone to type mistakes, we can >> now use the new struct_size() helper: > > I am okay with this patch in general. However, I think the name of the > helper 'struct_size' is a bit unfortunate. I really wondered on the > first read why it needs 3 arguments to find out a struct size. I only > understood on the second read. I think 'trailing_array_struct_size' > would be way more clearer what it does. I read that as an Acked-by... :-) Cheers, Peter
