Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] i2c: improve i2c_new_{device|dummy}

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



śr., 13 mar 2019 o 22:19 Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał(a):
>
>
> > No problem. Once you'll have these in your tree, could you provide me
> > with an immutable branch and I'll try to dig it out for at24 for v5.2?
>
> Quoting my cover letter ;)
>
> ===
>
> If the feedback is positive, then I plan to create an immutable branch for the
> at24- and MFD-trees after next rc1, so stuff can be based on top of it.
>

Point taken. Thanks!

Bart

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAlyJc+oACgkQFA3kzBSg
> KbaZNw//QKa58jcJaRbJYvmnw3QOtzrIrRK4TI9l6dVM6nb9gtcDtS1oJM6qvE9s
> PthN6nNOBj9+TOepD34gTgnfal+QhafC23SjziETrfAE/N57seKttJZW+P2JOKhW
> LLIkYIU8tmC68PLOxNTLbk8yG63n8z2527ICzF1Jp06v4RDP2FMntMRvaD5d5M48
> mJMrNCR9nzX52bk5lXu1zw4Tdh4vj3IwRFa2uUUA+dS7EYt82cRT6pq8BiGk/Svg
> NaySKqXjiNDHG8EQLUuQF7e30LWo+D+JCqxG0E+ir1rINlw9dJkzQSA49UmMbwn0
> jwwCFoM15ugVDAohdI64Pj5FiNGMl5zt2Fw3Ude0G+n5SN1BKRG2v947OvCJtYra
> Yd3PBT7CfubqfZHK4cF9SqGTsavHBYACIzOCjHCAnZDsrNEANCFuDcFUla94WQsa
> USMBw/BnEI6rpPlCgUA5n0NrcGResj3g9GJXxD7x0JKSjKyBXBeApZUx4tEWa2m8
> tc+JAHJ136BFDI7zaRgi2LDqFBvYwZpvJt0ttc9uA1B3u3UecG2QHBjp6XdTc7qM
> aDhXSYTxBXP6fJeFI3cf4aIwN9HqsWNwJDnG3I+/9ODiwvtG7IQFjxXJ+dSGSrlw
> 0sAWsPg3mavtEVjSYBLuUDZAchHGTULpjf/38iTx2D6BmmtX3S4=
> =Rd2y
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux