Hi Bjorn, thanks a lot for your additional information! > IMHO the split into two drivers is a bit of a mess and doesn't really > correspond with the hardware, as I mentioned at [1]. The PCI device > is the real hardware and the driver should claim that. AFAICT the > ACPI device exists only to pass some config information to the PCI > driver. I think the natural approach would be for the PCI driver to > directly search the ACPI namespace for that config information. AFAIR the AMD folks insisted on the two driver setup because they need it in the future? Maybe they can explain again here? > The fact that driver_find_device() is essentially unused except for a > few very special cases is a good clue that there's probably a better > way. Excactly this thinking made me recommend something else, too. Let's see what we can come up with. Thanks, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
