Hi Andrew, > I thought that might be coming :-) :) > I only have one instance of this devices, and an odd one at that, in > that it is x86 IO mapped, not the typical MMIO. I see. Well, odd devices are ususally a good regression test case. > Nor does it have a completion interrupt. Interesting. Don't you need this polling series then? http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/list/?series=73033 > And i'm not an FPGA programmer. That's not a problem. It is all about the Linux driver code. I am not an IP designer and still maintain the driver for some IP cores ;) > As a result, i cannot do too much testing of patches. Well, if you can check them to the best of your knowledge, this is already *much* appreciated. That's all I can do in most cases as well. > But i suppose i can be a co-maintainer. I will submit a patch for > MAINTAINERS. Cool, thank you very much! > I would prefer somebody else reviews my patches though. Sure thing! I will always have a look at patches before I apply them. Looking forward to your patch, Wolfram
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
