On 15.01.2018 21:53, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:30:07PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> HSI2C_MASTER_ST_LOSE state is not documented properly, extensive tests >> show that hardware is usually able to recover from this state without >> interrupting the transfer. On the other side enforcing transfer repetition >> in such case does not help in many situations, especially on busy systems >> and causes -EAGAIN and -ETIMEOUT errors. Moreover documentation says that >> such state can be caused by slave clock stretching, and should not be treated >> as an error. >> >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Can this be applied independently of my comments to patch 2? > Yes, please apply it alone. I will continue work on patch 2. -- Regards Andrzej
