On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 03:30:07PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > HSI2C_MASTER_ST_LOSE state is not documented properly, extensive tests > show that hardware is usually able to recover from this state without > interrupting the transfer. On the other side enforcing transfer repetition > in such case does not help in many situations, especially on busy systems > and causes -EAGAIN and -ETIMEOUT errors. Moreover documentation says that > such state can be caused by slave clock stretching, and should not be treated > as an error. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx> Can this be applied independently of my comments to patch 2?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
