> This describes why you change NULL to dev->sda_hold_time. But it doesn't > say why you introduce the switch-block instead of populating all fields > like it was done before. > > Furthermore, since now there is no NULL case for dw_i2c_acpi_params() > anymore, we can remove NULL handling in that function, or? And since designware driver had a few changes meanwhile, can you base the next version on top of i2c/for-next?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
