On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > pinctrl-mergebase-20120418 is not enough for me. I need mxs and dummy > states support. So if your devel branch will never be rebased, we can > simply ask Arnd and Olof to get that as the dependent branch? Hm, yes the devel branch is getting real stable now, so I will only add things on top. Basically the for-next branch is supposed to be even more stable, but right now it's a copy of devel. ARM SoC guys: how do you want the pinctrl deps? I can make a tag today if that is preferred. Also: short-cut to another subject: how have you other guys managed this? By e.g.: git fetch <pinctrl tree> git checkout -b my-pinwork v3.4-rc4 git merge pinctrl-tag (develop develop) Or: git checkout -b my-pinwork pinctrl-tag ? I was a bit uncertain on how to do this for the pending Ux500 stuff so better ask. I merged it for now but maybe it's better if I just base the whole pullrequest on top of a stable pinctrl branch? Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
