On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:39:06PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:35:33AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > > It's based on your for-next. But for working, it depends on > > pinctl/for-next. > Mark, may I have your ack to have it go through arm-soc? I will ask > Arnd pull your sound/for-v3.5 branch into arm-soc as a dependency. > You need to ensure the branch will not be rebased. for-3.5 is the entire undifferentiated blob of ASoC stuff, it's not really suitable for merging elsewhere. It won't actually get rebased but the idea of merging it into other trees doesn't seem terribly clever, it'd make having topic branches in arm-soc a bit of a joke and if you pull it right now you'll get problems in -next due to the the ux500 stuff. What does "working" mean in this context - what happens without the pinctl changes?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
