On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 09:44:04AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 02:39:06PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 08:35:33AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote:
>
> > > It's based on your for-next. But for working, it depends on
> > > pinctl/for-next.
>
> > Mark, may I have your ack to have it go through arm-soc? I will ask
> > Arnd pull your sound/for-v3.5 branch into arm-soc as a dependency.
> > You need to ensure the branch will not be rebased.
>
> for-3.5 is the entire undifferentiated blob of ASoC stuff, it's not
> really suitable for merging elsewhere. It won't actually get rebased
> but the idea of merging it into other trees doesn't seem terribly
> clever, it'd make having topic branches in arm-soc a bit of a joke and
> if you pull it right now you'll get problems in -next due to the the
> ux500 stuff.
>
> What does "working" mean in this context - what happens without the
> pinctl changes?
devm_pinctrl_get_select_default function is added in below commit which
is in pinctrl/for-next.
commit 6d4ca1fb467932773da7b808c52f3d7ef4461ba0
Author: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Apr 16 10:51:00 2012 -0600
pinctrl: implement devm_pinctrl_get()/put()
These functions allow the driver core to automatically clean up any
allocations made by drivers, thus leading to simplified drivers.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
So it'll fail compile without pinctrl/for-next. I guess Linus may need
to prepare a non-rebase base for others to merge.
Thanks
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
