Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-sh_mobile device tree support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 04:08:39PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> > > Of course, if you think it is cramping your SH device tree style then
> > > we can easily add a "renesas-shmobile-iic" entry as well.
> > > 
> > I obviously don't mind if you wish to use the rmobile naming convention
> > going forward, as the new parts have obviously dropped with the shmobile
> > naming convention, and it's likely you'll even be able to infer different
> > capabilities between rmobile vs shmobile. That's not sufficient cause to
> > prefer one over the other though, so you're still going to have to keep
> > things balanced. Simply having two aliases seems to me to be the easiest
> > solution.
> 
> "alias" is a second compatible entry here? Is it okay if this is added
> with a seperate patch when needed?
> 
Yes, that's fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux