Hi Paul, > > Of course, if you think it is cramping your SH device tree style then > > we can easily add a "renesas-shmobile-iic" entry as well. > > > I obviously don't mind if you wish to use the rmobile naming convention > going forward, as the new parts have obviously dropped with the shmobile > naming convention, and it's likely you'll even be able to infer different > capabilities between rmobile vs shmobile. That's not sufficient cause to > prefer one over the other though, so you're still going to have to keep > things balanced. Simply having two aliases seems to me to be the easiest > solution. "alias" is a second compatible entry here? Is it okay if this is added with a seperate patch when needed? Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
