Hi Michael, Ben, On Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:59:35 +0100, Michael Lawnick wrote: > Ben Dooks said the following: > > On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> Use a function pointer to decide whether to call i2c_add_adapter or > >> i2c_add_numbered_adapter. This makes the code more compact than the > >> current strategy of having the common code in a separate function. > > > > ok, how about changing i2c_add_numbered_adapter to take a -1 to mean > > assign bus number automatically? or something similar? > > IMHO better: i2c_add_adapter with optional (-1) bus parameter? Which problem are you both trying to solve, please? -- Jean Delvare -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
