Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c-algo-bit: Refactor adapter registration

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ben Dooks said the following:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:06:31AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
>> Use a function pointer to decide whether to call i2c_add_adapter or
>> i2c_add_numbered_adapter. This makes the code more compact than the
>> current strategy of having the common code in a separate function.
> 
> ok, how about changing i2c_add_numbered_adapter to take a -1 to mean
> assign bus number automatically? or something similar?

IMHO better: i2c_add_adapter with optional (-1) bus parameter?

-- 
KR
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux