Re: [PATCH 0/1] Better i2c access latencies in high load situations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Jean,

On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 13:49 +0200, ext Jean Delvare wrote:

> Can you please define "get a kick"? I don't know anything about
> rt_mutex.
> 

Sorry for using a vague metaphor. Documentation/rt-mutex.txt explains it
as:

"A low priority owner of a rt-mutex inherits the priority of a higher
priority waiter until the rt-mutex is released. If the temporarily
boosted owner blocks on a rt-mutex itself it propagates the priority
boosting to the owner of the other rt_mutex it gets blocked on. The
priority boosting is immediately removed once the rt_mutex has been
unlocked."

You might want to also take a look at Documentation/rt-mutex-design.txt

--Mika




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Hardward Monitoring]     [LM Sensors]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Media]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux