On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 06:56:13PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > > > > is_class_twl4030() feels like it should have better namespacing, > > though > > > > having the part name in there means it's not actually an issue. > > > How about twl_is_4030()? > > The idea was to have a class of twl4030 IC's type IC's. There are many of > > them with just different name (TPS *) > > ... twl_class_is_4030().... What you say ? > > Can I suggest: pmic_class_is_xxx() ? > Even better That feels like it's got a more global namespace than it ought - this is really only for this class of chip. It's also got a bit of an assumption that there's only one PMIC in the system which isn't always the case. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
