Hi Jean, Hmm, this one did not reach me via gmane ... something seems to be screwed up. > Von: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> (...) > > Incorporating such methods into subsystem would be much better of > > course. Probably as a sysFs entry automatically added to every adapter > > in /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-x > > Yes, this is exactly what I had in mind. > So we finally meet ;-) As this was my goal from the very beginning, I see that I will have to express myself more clearly. > > AFAICS I will do this in the next weeks. Regarding wiki the other > > question is whether I can take some official responsibility for such a > > patch. I'm doing it as a professional, bound to a project. Further > > development because of kernel changes in future wouldn't be supported in > > sufficient way :-( > > Contributing code today doesn't bind you to maintaining said code in > the future. You really shouldn't have to worry about this. Once your > code is upstream, the subsystem maintainer (i.e. me for i2c) will take > care of maintaining it. Of course if you _do_ have time in the future > to help with maintenance or contribute more code, this will be very > welcome, but this is in no way mandatory. > > -- > Jean Delvare -- Computer Bild Tarifsieger! GMX FreeDSL - Telefonanschluss + DSL für nur 17,95 Euro/mtl.!* http://dsl.gmx.de/?ac=OM.AD.PD003K11308T4569a -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-i2c" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
