On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 11:12:45AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:59:32AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > We could merge his patches (if he contacted the x86 crew), make a v2 of > > > > mine (71h -> 70h, add his Signed-off-by?) and merge, or some other option? > > > > > > > Either case, we'll need feedback from x86 maintainers. They are not exactly > > > happy if anyone pushes a patch into arch/x86 without their approval. > > > > Adding those PCI ids looks straight forward. So feel free to route them > > through hwmon with: > > ... but before you do that, let's wait for Brian to confirm the proper > model range. > > Thx. > > -- > Regards/Gruss, > Boris. > > ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. > -- Generally we use X0-XF for a model of processors. Starting at 70h would be preferred. The PCI devices match our internal documentation for what it's worth. I was going to test these patches but the system I borrowed was requisitioned and hasn't been returned yet so I can't test them now, but I don't want to delay these anymore. Assuming the change from 71h -> 70h, feel free to add: Acked-by: Brian Woods <brian.woods@xxxxxxx> -- Brian Woods
