On 19/07/2019 16:27, Guenter Roeck wrote: > Hi Marcel, > > On 7/19/19 12:40 AM, Marcel Bocu wrote: >> On 18/07/2019 22:33, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 09:26:16PM +0300, Marcel Bocu wrote: >>>> The AMD Ryzen gen 3 processors came with a different PCI IDs for the >>>> function 3 & 4 which are used to access the SMN interface. The root >>>> PCI address however remained at the same address as the model 30h. >>>> >>>> Adding the F3/F4 PCI IDs respectively to the misc and link ids appear >>>> to be sufficient for k10temp, so let's add them and follow up on the >>>> patch if other functions need more tweaking. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marcel Bocu <marcel.p.bocu@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> Tested-by: Marcel Bocu <marcel.p.bocu@xxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>> >>> How is this version of the patch series different to the first version ? >> >> They seem pretty much identical except for the macro's name (71h vs 70h) > > Normally (or at least so far) the device ID specifications are for a group > of models, not just for one chip in the group. Traditionally, AMD uses the > same PCI ID for model numbers 7xh, so 70h would probably be more appropriate. > Of course, that is hard to say without documentation from AMD, and I don't > see anything published for Ryzen 3000. Makes sense. Thanks for giving me some historical background! > >> and the fact that I already Cc:ed the x86 crew. I had checked this >> weekend if there were patches already for this, but I guess Vicki sent >> his patches right after I checked. Sorry for the noise! >> >> Could anyone add Vicki Pfau (I don't have his email address because I >> subscribed to this list after he sent his patches), and then we can ask >> him if he already submited his patches to x86 or not. >> >> In any case, whatever patchset gets selected for inclusion, I suggest we >> both sign off on the commit (I do not care about authorship). I will >> anyway try to follow up with other patches to access the chipset's >> temperature and the fan speed. >> > > Wouldn't that require patches to the Super-IO chip on your board ? > That seems orthogonal to this patch series (and to the R3000 CPU). Yes, but what I meant is that I don't mind not having authorship on these patches since most of my work will be on adding new features. Sorry for not being clear. > >> Sorry again for the noise! > > Sorry myself, I didn't realize that the patches were from different people > since they looked similar. I can't blame you for that! Could anyone in this thread add Vicki Pfau to figure out what's the best course of action? We could merge his patches (if he contacted the x86 crew), make a v2 of mine (71h -> 70h, add his Signed-off-by?) and merge, or some other option? Marcel > > Guenter >
