On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 01:36:27PM +0100, Greg KH wrote: > configfs has two current maintainers, I don't think we need another one, > but they should have at least responded to the patch series previously I've clearly stated that I'm not going to take these "interesting" new atomic semantics without an ACK from Al. And to be honest even with that feature creep isn't exactly on my wish list.
Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:44:14 +0100
- In-reply-to: <YYfIS/sK+OAF8xsA@kroah.com>
- References: <20211104190030.20660-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdZchV1M+BYhMYoXNj_+uUHZeydW5-nHGTjD2bZedAqKKw@mail.gmail.com> <YYfIS/sK+OAF8xsA@kroah.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- References:
- [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Linus Walleij
- Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Greg KH
- [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -next] gpio: virtio: remove unneeded semicolon
- Next by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Index(es):
 |