On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:01 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > A couple months have passed with a few more iterations and I still can't get > any meaningful reviews from the configfs maintainers (nor NAKs for that > matter). I decided to give it another try and send it to you directly again. I think this indicates that configfs is partly orphaned. If not formally then practically. Let's poke Greg and see what he says, configfs is important for USB. I do understand the lack of maintainership hours and that people have more important things to do, we all suffer from this. If you are the only one who really care maybe we should consider listing you as configfs (co-)maintainer as well? This pull request FWIW: Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> Yours, Linus Walleij