On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > I think this indicates that configfs is partly orphaned. If not formally > then practically. Let's poke Greg and see what he says, configfs > is important for USB. I don't think so. It is regularly maintained as you could easily see in the log.
Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 08:45:21 +0100
- In-reply-to: <CACRpkdZchV1M+BYhMYoXNj_+uUHZeydW5-nHGTjD2bZedAqKKw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <20211104190030.20660-1-brgl@bgdev.pl> <CACRpkdZchV1M+BYhMYoXNj_+uUHZeydW5-nHGTjD2bZedAqKKw@mail.gmail.com>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
- References:
- [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Bartosz Golaszewski
- Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- From: Linus Walleij
- [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Prev by Date: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Next by Date: Re: [RFC 1/3] gpiolib: remove irq_to_gpio() definition
- Previous by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Next by thread: Re: [GIT PULL] configfs-based GPIO simulator for v5.16
- Index(es):
 |