On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 8:01 PM Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > A couple months have passed with a few more iterations and I still can't get > > any meaningful reviews from the configfs maintainers (nor NAKs for that > > matter). I decided to give it another try and send it to you directly again. > > I think this indicates that configfs is partly orphaned. If not formally > then practically. Let's poke Greg and see what he says, configfs > is important for USB. > > I do understand the lack of maintainership hours and that people have > more important things to do, we all suffer from this. > > If you are the only one who really care maybe we should consider listing > you as configfs (co-)maintainer as well? configfs has two current maintainers, I don't think we need another one, but they should have at least responded to the patch series previously :( greg k-h