On Friday 21 July 2017 01:27 AM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Keerthy, > >> >> On Thursday 20 July 2017 03:12 PM, Keerthy wrote: >>> The patch series does a couple of important return handling which were missed >>> earlier in the driver probe. >>> >>> This is based on Suman's: >>> >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150034845427555&w=2 >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150034856627618&w=2 >>> >> >> My bad! The series has no dependency on the above. I have split the >> device tree patches to keep it independent. > > The new patches looks clean. The davinci_gpio_irq_setup() function > though could also do with couple more cleanups. Not all failure paths > are doing the necessary cleanup (there are some non devres functions > also called, but not cleaned up). Linus, Any comments on this series? Regards, Keerthy > > regards > Suman > >> >>> Changes in v2: >>> >>> * Removed the device tree patch for to keep the series independent. >>> >>> Keerthy (3): >>> gpio: davinci: Use devm_gpiochip_add_data in place of >>> gpiochip_add_data >>> gpio: davinci: Handle the return value of davinci_gpio_irq_setup >>> function >>> gpio: davinci: Convert prinkt to dev_err >>> >>> drivers/gpio/gpio-davinci.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++----- >>> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) >>> > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html