[RFC] drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c broken for PCA9505 ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

Our SOC has PCA9505 IO expander,
Basically I was implementing PCI hotplug, e.g. PCI present lines got
to IO expander.

I had to fix the driver at some places.
but I am not sure, if driver was written considering 9505 chip ?
in fact it declares 9505 as PCA953X_TYPE.

some of the fixes which I have made are

1) #define PCAL953X_INT_MASK       36  (it was 37 before)
pca953x_write_regs_24  has very odd way of calculating register offset.

int bank_shift = fls((chip->gpio_chip.ngpio - 1) / BANK_SZ);
i2c write to
reg << bank_shift

which was coming 37 << 3 as 0x128 and which is u8 data type.
will address 0x28 which is invalid locaiton.

36 << 3 as 0x120, which will address 0x20 correctly.
although again thsi is odd way of deriving offset.
I am following datasheet:
http://www.nxp.com/docs/en/data-sheet/PCA9505_9506.pdf

2) #define PCAL953X_IN_LATCH       34
above LATCH is not present.

3) #define PCAL953X_INT_STAT       38
above also points to indirect locaiton.

please suggest if this diver was written with 9505 in mind ?

Regards,
Oza.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux SPI]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux