Hello, On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 04:58:15PM +0100, Janusz Użycki wrote: > > W dniu 2014-11-17 o 16:53, Uwe Kleine-König pisze: > >Hello, > > > >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 11:05:51AM +0100, Richard Genoud wrote: > >>2014-11-17 10:59 GMT+01:00 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >>>Hello Richard, > >>> > >>>>>>>>So finally the prototypes would be: > >>>>>>>>int mctrl_gpio_request_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*, struct > >>>>>>>>uart_port*, irqhandler_t); > >>>>>>>>void mctrl_gpio_free_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*); > >>>>>>I think: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> struct mctrl_gpios { > >>>>>> struct uart_port *port; > >>>>>> struct { > >>>>>> gpio_desc *gpio; > >>>>>> unsigned int irq; > >>>>I think it's just "int irq;" there > >>>irqs are unsigned. Some functions returning an irq use "int", but > >>>depending on who you ask this only for error reporting or a relict. > >>>Use 0 for invalid/unused in mctrl_gpio*. > >>> > >>>>>Yes. I tried to assign irq value in mctrl_gpio_init() only. > >>>>>There was another issue if CONFIG_GPIOLIB is not defined but it looks mctrl_ > >>>>>disable/enable_ms() > >>>>>and mctrl_ irq handler solve the problem. > >>>>> > >>>>>> Not sure there is a corresponding request_irq variant for that. > >>>>> > >>>>>What would you propose? > >>>>In atmel_request_gpio_irq(), the function irq_set_status_flags(irq, > >>>>IRQ_NOAUTOEN); is used before request_irq to prevent the irq from > >>>>being enabled when requested. > >>>I'm not sure this is allowed. How do you handle request_irq failing? (I > >>>just checked: you don't.) Consider another thread just doing > >>>request_irq($yourirq, ...) between > >>> > >>> irq_set_status_flags(irq[i], IRQ_NOAUTOEN); > >>> > >>>and > >>> > >>> err = request_irq(irq[i], ... > >>well, in this case, request_irq() will fail and all the previously > >>requested irqs will be freed: > >> /* > >> * If something went wrong, rollback. > >> */ > >> while (err && (--i >= 0)) > >> if (irq[i] >= 0) > >> free_irq(irq[i], port); > >Just in case you didn't notice: Your statement is right, but for the > >other caller to request_irq there is something fishy. He gets > >IRQ_NOAUTOEN without being able to notice ... > > Likely the gpio interrupts will never shared. We can say mctrl_gpio > is the only owner > of a gpio after a request. Right. The important part of your sentence is: "after a request". So at the time irq_set_status_flags(..., IRQ_NOAUTOEN) is called, you're not yet owning it. At a minimum you must clear the flag in the error path. I'd like to have a statement from Thomas here if this is considered OK. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html