W dniu 2014-11-16 o 22:42, Uwe Kleine-König pisze:
Hello Janusz,
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:27:06PM +0100, Janusz Uzycki wrote:
Function gpiod_get_direction() of gpiolib calls get_direction()
callback. If chip doesn't implement it EINVAL error is returned.
The function doesn't use for returned value shadowed FLAG_IS_OUT
bit of gpio_desc.flags field so the callback is required.
This sounds like a bugfix but "required" is wrong as AFAIR this call is
optional and hardly used. Or did that change? The only drawback is that
the debug output for (by Linux) uninitialized gpios is wrong.
Yes, the callback is optional but gpiod_get_direction() doesn't work
without it.
gpiod_get_direction() doesn't seem optional,
Documentation/gpio/consumer.txt:
"A driver can also query the current direction of a GPIO:
int gpiod_get_direction(const struct gpio_desc *desc)
This function will return either GPIOF_DIR_IN or GPIOF_DIR_OUT.
Be aware that there is no default direction for GPIOs. Therefore,
**using a GPIO
without setting its direction first is illegal and will result in undefined
behavior!**"
There is nothing about EINVAL error. It happens despite direction was
set before. The reason is undefined get_direction callback.
I still think you must not rely on gpiod_get_direction working. Some
controllers might not be able to provide this info and if you know that
the direction was set before, there is no need to ask the framework.
(Although I admit it might be comfortable at times.)
The commit f9e42397d79b6e810437ba1130b0b4b594f5e56c
("serial: mxs-auart: add interrupts for modem control lines")
is based on Richard's commit ab5e4e4108ca5d8326cb6b4b3a21b096a002f68f
("tty/serial: at91: add interrupts for modem control lines").
Both patches use the condition:
"if (gpiod && (gpiod_get_direction(gpiod) == GPIOF_DIR_IN))"
This is broken. Actually you want to loop only over the functions in
mctrl_gpios_desc that are inputs (i.e. CTS, DSR, DCD and RNG) and don't
depend on the hardware state and/or a working gpiod_get_direction.
For that another mctrl_ helper function would be nice that does the
required request_irqs for a given struct mctrl_gpios pointer. That would
be more valuable than adding the same boilerplate to another driver.
Also note that there is nothing special required in the irq handler in
this case, just passing your struct uart_port is enough. That also has
the nice side effect that not the complete driver's logic to dissect the
irq reason is needed and so probably all drivers using that mctrl_gpio
stuff could be simplified.
[...]
at91 had defined get_direction() callback, mxs platform not.
The condition helps to find gpio-inputs to set them as interrupts.
Likely gpiod_get_direction() was used because
drivers/tty/serial/serial_mctrl_gpio.c
has no function to read back "dir_out" from mctrl_gpios_desc table.
There were the ways to fix it:
a) add to serial_mctrl_gpio.c function to read the "dir_out" and use
it instead of
gpiod_get_direction()
if gpiod_get_direction() still used in the condition:
b) modify gpiod_get_direction() implementation in gpiolib.c:
if get_direction() callback is not defined use shadow flag
(FLAG_IS_OUT)
That would be broken.
c) modify drivers/gpio/gpio-generic.c:
bgpio_init() could assign to get_direction default callback
if BGPIOF_UNREADABLE_REG_DIR is not set
Not sure this would be correct. I pass the question to Linus.
d) implement get_direction callback in gpio-mxs.c
My suggestion isn't included in your list and IMHO is the best.
Solution d) was selected because it is safe for other drivers.
That's a poor argument. Sure, implementing a generic solution that is
used on several platforms is not "safe" as you probably cannot test them
all. But the result is better: More generic code, more people using it
and so find the bugs in it.
Although a) and b)
are also nice the patch doesn't modify neither serial_mctrl_gpio.c and
atmel_serial.c nor gpiolib.c. It focuses on mxs platform as needed for
the commit "serial: mxs-auart: add interrupts for modem control lines".
I wouldn't call a) nice because in the presence of my suggested solution
there is no need for a driver to use this function. b) is broken and so
cannot be nice.
Thanks Uwe. I fully agree with you.
a) was just a starter to your suggestion. My options were too
conservative - I just
wanted to avoid tests on hardware I don't have.
I don't understand why gpiod_get_direction() always requires the callback
and b) would be broken (I'm not so familiar with gpiolib) but I don't
need it now.
So, it looks we can drop the gpio-mxs patch, yes?
And, I or Richard should submit a patch for
mctrl_gpio/atmel_serial/mxs-auart
to introduce the irq helper, yes?
You wrote passing uart_port is enough. Argument "name" for request_irq()
can be
recovered from dev_name(dev) or dev_driver_string(dev) where dev =
port_uart->dev.
But irqhandler and mctrl_gpios must be passed to
mctrl_gpio_request_irqs() helper.
The gpio_irq table could be hidden and moved into struct mctrl_gpios. Then
a second helper function is required: mctrl_gpio_free_irqs().
gpio_irq table initialized in mctrl_gpio_request_irqs().
So finally the prototypes would be:
int mctrl_gpio_request_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*, struct uart_port*,
irqhandler_t);
void mctrl_gpio_free_irqs(struct mctrl_gpios*);
Richard, what do you think about?
best regards
Janusz
Best regards
Uwe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
