The test to make sure we support hole punching is just wrong. First it passes
the mode options into the len argument, and secondly it uses 0 for what I assume
was meant for the length, which doesn't work right. Also it uses warn instead
of just normal prt, which will cause xfstests to blow up for no reason. So fix
the arguments and the error message so that we can actually run xfstests with
fsx on fs's that don't support hole punching yet. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
ltp/fsx.c | 9 ++++-----
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ltp/fsx.c b/ltp/fsx.c
index 662af38..692ad58 100644
--- a/ltp/fsx.c
+++ b/ltp/fsx.c
@@ -1261,11 +1261,10 @@ test_punch_hole()
{
#ifdef FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE
if (!lite && punch_hole_calls) {
- if (fallocate(fd, 0, 0,
- FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE) &&
- errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
-
- warn("main: filesystem does not support fallocate punch hole, disabling");
+ if (fallocate(fd, FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE | FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE, 0, 1) &&
+ errno == EOPNOTSUPP) {
+ if (!quiet)
+ prt("main: filesystem does not support fallocate punch hole, disabling\n");
punch_hole_calls = 0;
}
}
--
1.7.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
