On Thu 26-10-23 17:08:00, Christian Brauner wrote: > > your taste it could be also viewed as kind of layering violation so I'm not > > 100% convinced this is definitely a way to go. > > Yeah, I'm not convinced either. As I said, I really like that right now > ti's a vfs thing only and we don't have specific requirements about how > devices are closed which is really nice. So let's just leave it as is? Yes, fine by me. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR
