Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] fs,block: yield devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> your taste it could be also viewed as kind of layering violation so I'm not
> 100% convinced this is definitely a way to go.

Yeah, I'm not convinced either. As I said, I really like that right now
ti's a vfs thing only and we don't have specific requirements about how
devices are closed which is really nice. So let's just leave it as is?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [NTFS 3]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [NTFS 3]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]

  Powered by Linux