On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 05:08:00PM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote: > > your taste it could be also viewed as kind of layering violation so I'm not > > 100% convinced this is definitely a way to go. > > Yeah, I'm not convinced either. As I said, I really like that right now > ti's a vfs thing only and we don't have specific requirements about how > devices are closed which is really nice. So let's just leave it as is? Yes, I can't really get excited about this change in any way.
