Re: Reiser4. BEST FILESYSTEM EVER.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David H. Lynch Jr wrote:
Jeff Garzik wrote:
David H. Lynch Jr wrote:

I'm arguing against circular logic:  the claim that one cannot
determine reiser4's true usefulness unless its in the tree.

The better method is to get a distro to add reiser4, _then_ if it
proves worthy add it to the kernel tree.

Not the other way around.

    And is that how other filesystems made it into the tree ?

In the case of most major filesystems, yes. Distros are a proving ground for new stuff, not the upstream kernel.


    I regularly see drivers with very little in the way of testing go
straight nearly straight into the tree - without even getting tagged as
experimental.

Hardware drivers are vastly different from filesystem drivers.

	Jeff



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Ext4 Filesystem]     [Union Filesystem]     [Filesystem Testing]     [Ceph Users]     [Ecryptfs]     [AutoFS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux Cachefs]     [Reiser Filesystem]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [CEPH Development]
  Powered by Linux