On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 14:59 -0600, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 12:38:49PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > On 03/07/2013 09:40 AM, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > We know that with some firmware implementations writing too much data to > > > UEFI variables can lead to bricking machines. Recent changes attempt to > > > address this issue, but for some it may still be prudent to avoid > > > writing large amounts of data until the solution has been proven on a > > > wide variety of hardware. > > > > > > Crash dumps or other data from pstore can potentially be a large data > > > source. Add a new option, CONFIG_EFI_VARS_PSTORE, which can be set to N > > > to avoid using efivars as a backend to pstore. > > > > What about a command line option? > > That could be done. I'm assuming you want this instead of a config > option, defaulted to on? > > How would you feel about a config option for the default value of the > command line option? I intend to default this to off in Ubuntu for a > while as a colleague's machine was recently bricked on two different > occasions after the kernel oopsed. The config option would simplify > things a bit for us, though we could always carry a patch changing the > default value. Not sure why a command line option would be a more natural solution to this problem? The original patch looked fine to me. All other pstore backends are guarded by Kconfig options. Though I could see an argument for a kernel parameter to turn off the EFI pstore backend code, even if it's compiled into the kernel. But that would be better as an additional patch. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html