Michael Krufky wrote: > Oliver Endriss wrote: > > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > >>>>> If we should go back to 2.6.23 level, so far nobody seems to have > >>>>> realized a improvement for the LifeView Trio stuff, I'm not against it. > >>>>> > >>>>> The changeset in question to revert is mercurial 6579. > >>>>> > >>>>> If nobody else is interested and no comments, I also don't care anymore. > >>>>> > >>>> (Basically I don't care because I am tired of discussing kernel > >>>> politics.) > >>>> > >>>> Imho a fix should be applied, no matter how many lines it has. > >>>> If that is not possible the offending patch should be reverted in > >>>> 2.6.24.x. > >>>> > >> ... > >> > >> Let me try to reset to a sane state. > >> > >> With the current tree (changesets 6579 and 7186), is there any broken board? If > >> so, what board(s)? > >> > >> Both patches are already applied at mainstream and should be available on > >> 2.6.25. Are those OK for 2.6.25? > >> > >> Is there any missing patch that should be sent to -stable (2.6.24)? If so, what > >> patch? > >> > > > > The point is that 6579 was applied to 2.6.24.x, but 7186 wasn't. > > So TTS_1401 support is broken for the 2.6.24 series. > > > > Imho 7186 _must_ be applied to 2.6.24, no matter how large the patch is. > > > Are you saying that THIS is the patch that needs to be applied to 2.6.24.y ? > > http://linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb/rev/eb6bc7f18024 > > If so, this patch seems fine for -stable. We just have to make sure it > applies correctly, etc. Correct, this is the patch. I did a quick check: It applies to 2.6.24.2 with some hunks. CU Oliver -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- VDR Remote Plugin 0.4.0: http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/vdr/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
