Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > > If we should go back to 2.6.23 level, so far nobody seems to have > > > > realized a improvement for the LifeView Trio stuff, I'm not against it. > > > > > > > > The changeset in question to revert is mercurial 6579. > > > > > > > > If nobody else is interested and no comments, I also don't care anymore. > > > > > > (Basically I don't care because I am tired of discussing kernel > > > politics.) > > > > > > Imho a fix should be applied, no matter how many lines it has. > > > If that is not possible the offending patch should be reverted in > > > 2.6.24.x. > ... > > Let me try to reset to a sane state. > > With the current tree (changesets 6579 and 7186), is there any broken board? If > so, what board(s)? > > Both patches are already applied at mainstream and should be available on > 2.6.25. Are those OK for 2.6.25? > > Is there any missing patch that should be sent to -stable (2.6.24)? If so, what > patch? The point is that 6579 was applied to 2.6.24.x, but 7186 wasn't. So TTS_1401 support is broken for the 2.6.24 series. Imho 7186 _must_ be applied to 2.6.24, no matter how large the patch is. CU Oliver -- ---------------------------------------------------------------- VDR Remote Plugin 0.4.0: http://www.escape-edv.de/endriss/vdr/ ---------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
