On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 00:27:18 +0200 Oliver Endriss <o.endriss@xxxxxx> wrote: > mkrufky@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > ... > > ...all of this noise was made, and now not a single person is willing to > > test the proposed solution? > > > > I don't think that there will be many more 2.6.24.y releases. I have an > > ivtv patch queued for 2.6.24.5, and this tda10086 patch is sitting in my > > outbox, waiting for test results. > > > > I suspect that 2.6.25 will be released in a few days, after which, > > 2.6.24.y -stable release turnaround gets slower and slower, and most > > likely will end by the time 2.6.26 is released. > > > > If you want this fixed, then the fix needs testing .... NOW. > > Always the same story. :-( > > We need a test center, or preferably a community of testers who are > willing to do regression tests with the drivers... Agreed. Michael, About this specific patch, I don't see any reason why not forwarding it to 2.6.24. There were some reports already about this fixing some broken LNA. Cheers, Mauro _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
