On Wed, 9 May 2007, Lucian Muresan wrote: > blues dvb # ls -al /dev/dvb/* > /dev/dvb/adapter0: > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 100 May 9 2007 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 80 May 9 2007 .. > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 4 May 9 2007 demux0 > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 5 May 9 2007 dvr0 > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 7 May 9 2007 net0 > > /dev/dvb/adapter1: > total 0 > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 120 May 9 2007 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 80 May 9 2007 .. > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 68 May 9 2007 demux0 > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 69 May 9 2007 dvr0 > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 67 May 9 2007 frontend0 > crw-rw---- 1 root video 212, 71 May 9 2007 net0 > > Nevertheless, I wanted to point out that it seems that the frontend > which was found, namely the one from the HVR-1300 was hooked under the > DVB-S adapter (maybe by udev?), and thus none of the 2 cards where So the frontend that didn't work because of missing lnbp21 support was the DVB-S one? And the the DVB-S adapter is adapter1, and the HVR-1300 is adapter0? Or is it different? What I'm asking is, is adapter0 or adapter1 the device that needs lnbp21? Keep in mind that which card ends up as adapter0 or 1 is not necessarily the always going to be the same. It's not clear to me that there really is a DVB problem. It looks like maybe adapter0 is the one that needs he missing driver, and so is missing its fontend, and adapter1 is fine. > actually usable (like I said, kaffeine refused to show them as detected). Which could be a kaffeine problem. It might see that adapter0/frontend0 doesn't exist, and then assume it has found all adapters. _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
