Em Qui, 2007-04-05 às 17:10 -0400, Michael Krufky escreveu: > It appears that I may have been misunderstood. > > Your argument is completely valid, I only ask that nobody touch tda8290.c or > tda827x.c until Hartmut and I are done with our upcoming changes. Yes. It doesn't make sense touching the code right now, before we've agreed on the changes. There's just a point that worries me: Markus, Manu and you are coding different solutions for the API. We should focus our discussion at the API changes *then* coding the drivers. Otherwise, the discussion will just generate warm, since each one will defend his approach, according with his own foot and it would be really hard to have a common approach. My suggestion is to start the discussion from Markus RFC, since it is the first one who proposed an RFC on this subject, (his second approach is dated from Feb, 27). He sent the 3rd approach today. As it is an RFC, and provided that *all* keep the discussions at the highest possible technical level, not starting or answering to personal flames, I can see everyone collaborating on this and converging to a common sense. This is a good time to remind about good values. Happy Easter for all! -- Cheers, Mauro _______________________________________________ linux-dvb mailing list linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
