Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Since FE == NIM, why should a change to "NIM_*" be important (but
rather it is just a cosmetic change which yields yet another level of
confusion), any specific reason you have, considering everywhere else
in the API it is "FE_*" ?
I never said it was important, it's just an example for a prefix.
Choose whatever you like, I don't really care.
Ah yes, it is quite irrelevant for the adding in even more confusion.
This is how the manufacturers call RF modules:
Alps: Digital Tuner
Broadcom: NIM
Intel (Zarlink): NIM, front-end device
Philips: NIM
Samsung: NIM
Sharp: Front-End Unit
ST: NIM
to chip in more,
Fujitsu: Silicon Tuner
Hyundai: Reciever
LG:Silicon Tuner, Tuner, Digital Tuner
Philips: NIM
Regards,
Manu
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
