Re: [PATCH] Moving ALPS BSRV2 tuner handling code to separate file.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Manu Abraham wrote:
Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Btw. such a change has been proposed by me last summer and Johannes
suggested using a common prefix like "fe-" although I'd vote for using
"nim_".
generally, the demod is called a NIM, and the entire tuner is called the
frontend.
I think the "fe_" sounds more appropriate.

You're wrong. A NIM is the complete module.


Ah, thanks for correcting it. Since FE == NIM, why should a change to "NIM_*" be important (but rather it is just a cosmetic change which yields yet another level of confusion), any specific reason you have, considering everywhere else in the API it is "FE_*" ?


Manu


_______________________________________________

linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Asterisk]     [Samba]     [Xorg]     [Xfree86]     [Linux USB]

  Powered by Linux