Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Michael Krufky wrote:
Andreas Oberritter wrote:
Michael Krufky wrote:
I would much rather see the pll definition moved into dvb-pll, and the
pll_set function altered to use dvb_pll_configure.
The code can still be changed to use dvb-pll afterwards without
unnecessary code duplication.
I can agree to that. The same can be done for lg-h06xf, and many
others. A lot of duplicated code could be removed, and I do agree that
this would be a step forward. The only problem I see with this is that
we'll end up with many tiny little header files just like this one,
bsbe1.h and bsru6.h ... This isn't necessarily a bad thing either. I
just didn't know if this is what we wanted to be doing. Would it make
sense to consolidate these small files into single source.[ch] files?
I like small independent files.
Btw. such a change has been proposed by me last summer and Johannes
suggested using a common prefix like "fe-" although I'd vote for using
"nim_".
generally, the demod is called a NIM, and the entire tuner is called the
frontend.
I think the "fe_" sounds more appropriate.
_______________________________________________
linux-dvb@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.linuxtv.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/linux-dvb
