> Le Mardi 22 Novembre 2005 02:20, Q a ?crit : > > > >> And why shouldn't my preference (or anyone else's) be just as valid as >> yours? > > > Because YOU asked, not us. > YOU need a response, not us. > > > >> Anyway I will be unsubribing shortly, so you can continue this 'debate' >> among yourselves. >> > > > Bye. > > -- > Christophe Thommeret > > > raid517 wrote: > Again that is your opinion on the way things should be done. > Personally I like my language to be flexible and adapt as and when the > need arrises. > > No one needs to reread what you just wrote, because they have already > read it on the list. The vast majority of them are already following > the conversation. They will have recieved your email before they > recieve mine. > > And that IS a logical order. > > Clearly you don't start a conversation and then repeat everything the > person you are speaking to says before replying to them. > > GJ > > > > Christophe Thommeret wrote: > when you post to a public forum you have to stick to the rules. I'm not sure that in this list there's formally the "no top-reply" rule, but top-replying is surely considered a very annoying thing to do. There's a very simple and valid reason not to do it: it's needed to keep the context !!! Now let's terminate this thread, please. -- Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: la vetrina delle aziende del Canavese industriali, artigianali e di servizi Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=3606&d=22-11
