Andrew de Quincey wrote: > Well here is my opinion: > > Should we have "one library to rule them all", or split it into seperate > sublibraries? Having seperate libraries is cleaner architecturally, but might > be overkill... anyone have any really good arguments either way? > Having sublibraries will keep confusion to an utmost maximum, and will be helpful in extending the same at a later stage in any aspect, if required. IMHO this would be advantageous.. For example the main issue that i had initially to go with ca_zap from scratch was based upon the same idea. Tomorrow is somebody needs to do xyz, it should provide expandability for the same, rather than a tightly integrated infrastructure. My thoughts.. Manu
