On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:10:12PM +0000, Rupesh Gujare wrote: > On 21/11/12 21:48, Greg KH wrote: > >On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:26:12PM +0000, Rupesh Gujare wrote: > >>On 21/11/12 16:19, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >>>When someone sends a patch there are a several possible responses: > >>>1) Ack the patch. > >>>2) Request that the submitter redo it. The downside is that no one > >>> likes redoing patches. > >>>3) Reject the patch. > >>>4) Redo it yourself and say "Based on a patch from Sachin Kamat". > >>> This isn't nice because everyone wants author credit. > >>>5) Redo it and get permission from the original author to give them > >>> author credit get their signed-off-by. > >>> > >>> > >>Thanks Dan > >> > >>I will keep it in mind in future. > >> > >>Sachin, > >> > >>Are you interested in redoing (or sending sign-off ?) for this patch > >>series ? I am more than happy to accept either. > >Don't worry, I'll clean up the mess here... > > > > > Sorry Greg, > > But looks like you applied V1 of this patch series, rather than V2. > Is that intentional ? Yes. You got the authorship version wrong on your set of patches, so I took V1 which correctly handled it. And, I commented on your one different patch. Please resend anything, based on the patches I took, if you want to see them done differently. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
