On 21/11/12 21:48, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 05:26:12PM +0000, Rupesh Gujare wrote:
On 21/11/12 16:19, Dan Carpenter wrote:
When someone sends a patch there are a several possible responses:
1) Ack the patch.
2) Request that the submitter redo it. The downside is that no one
likes redoing patches.
3) Reject the patch.
4) Redo it yourself and say "Based on a patch from Sachin Kamat".
This isn't nice because everyone wants author credit.
5) Redo it and get permission from the original author to give them
author credit get their signed-off-by.
Thanks Dan
I will keep it in mind in future.
Sachin,
Are you interested in redoing (or sending sign-off ?) for this patch
series ? I am more than happy to accept either.
Don't worry, I'll clean up the mess here...
Sorry Greg,
But looks like you applied V1 of this patch series, rather than V2. Is
that intentional ?
Below is link for V2 :-
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-November/033339.html
& yes, V2 is missing -
From: Sachin Kamat<sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Regards,
Rupesh Gujare
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
