Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: >> I only combined the pending ath6kl patches, I did not edit them. >> Vasanth sent patch 4 few days earlier and that's why you see the >> change here. But if greg wants, I can drop patch 4 and resend the >> series. > > Part of the problem is that patch doesn't add the check for NULL > consistently throughout the function. There is a place where a NULL > deref could still be triggered later on. Let's just drop it instead > of fixing it. Agreed. But I see that Greg applied the patch 4 already. So I just drop patch 4 from my patchset and resend patch 5 as is (ie. removing the unnecessary null check). -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
