On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 10:52:33AM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > >> I only combined the pending ath6kl patches, I did not edit them. > >> Vasanth sent patch 4 few days earlier and that's why you see the > >> change here. But if greg wants, I can drop patch 4 and resend the > >> series. > > > > Part of the problem is that patch doesn't add the check for NULL > > consistently throughout the function. There is a place where a NULL > > deref could still be triggered later on. Let's just drop it instead > > of fixing it. > > Agreed. > > But I see that Greg applied the patch 4 already. So I just drop patch > 4 from my patchset and resend patch 5 as is (ie. removing the > unnecessary null check). Yep. It really should go the 3.0 kernel along with [PATCH 3/5] ath6kl: cache firmware. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
