On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 04:23:36PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote: > I only combined the pending ath6kl patches, I did not edit them. > Vasanth sent patch 4 few days earlier and that's why you see the > change here. But if greg wants, I can drop patch 4 and resend the > series. Part of the problem is that patch doesn't add the check for NULL consistently throughout the function. There is a place where a NULL deref could still be triggered later on. Let's just drop it instead of fixing it. regards, dan carpenter _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
