Re: [PATCH 3/5] ath6kl: cache firmware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> >> +    if (*buf == NULL) {
>> >> +	    if ((A_REQUEST_FIRMWARE(&fw_entry, filename, ((struct device *)ar->osDevInfo.pOSDevice))) != 0)
>> >> +	    {
>> >             ^
>> >
>> > This is on the wrong line.
>> 
>> I'll answer this and all the other style comments in one go:
>> 
>> All the style issues are from the original code. I want to separate
>> functional and cleanup patches so I didn't do any cleanup in this
>> patch. But as we are doing the cleanup in a different tree anyway I
>> didn't see the point of sending a separate cleanup patch.
>> 
>
> No.  That was in a section of code which was added.  There wasn't
> a "buf" variable in the original code.  You obviously know how it's
> supposed to look because you did it correctly on the line before.

Oh, you are right. Sorry about that, I'll fix that in v2.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux GPIO]     [Linux SPI]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux